Choosing the right path for leadership development is more than a tactical choice—it’s a strategic one. Here’s how the options compare across key factors:
| Factor | Moonraker Innovation | Do Nothing (No Leadership Training) | Run Training with Internal Staff | Use Other External Trainers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
✅ Access to proven, field-tested military leadership frameworks with real-world credibility ✅ Highly engaging sessions that spark real learning ✅ Tailored to your industry, leadership maturity and business context ✅ Practical tools that leaders use immediately—not just theory ✅ Long-term behaviour change supported with coaching and follow-up ✅ Delivered by instructors with real command experience, not career facilitators ✅ Trusted by clients across sectors, with consistently top-level feedback |
✅ No upfront financial cost ✅ No disruption to working hours or team schedules |
✅ Lower-cost option using in-house resource ✅ Familiarity with company culture and internal processes ✅ Can integrate company-specific terminology and tools |
✅ Wide variety of providers and formats ✅ External voice can challenge internal assumptions ✅ Some offer access to accredited models and certifications |
| Cons |
❌ Higher investment compared to internal or DIY options ❌ Requires time away from the desk for immersive learning ❌ As a small team, we focus on depth, not breadth—our offer is bespoke but not broad ❌ No pre-recorded, “on-demand” options—our work is live, interactive and immersive |
❌ No improvement—existing problems remain or worsen ❌ Teams stay stuck in unproductive habits ❌ Retention, morale and engagement decline over time ❌ Leadership gaps widen under pressure ❌ Culture erodes due to inconsistent behaviour and poor communication |
❌ Often deprioritised internally due to other demands ❌ Trainers may lack specialist leadership development expertise ❌ Can be seen as less credible by staff ❌ Internal politics or interpersonal dynamics may block honest conversations ❌ Training may feel less dynamic or energising ❌ Takes significant time to prepare the content and rehearse |
❌ Quality and delivery vary significantly between providers ❌ Many use theory-heavy, generic materials that lack impact ❌ Rarely tailored to your organisation’s context or challenges ❌ Engagement often low—especially with on-demand, passive formats ❌ Trainers may lack real-world leadership experience, reducing credibility with senior audiences ❌ Little or no follow-up, making behaviour change unlikely |
The Moonraker Difference: We combine depth, relevance and practical impact. Our method is proven, our delivery is immersive, and our trainers have the credibility to win over even the most experienced managers.
